Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, No. 22-660 [Arg: 10.10.2023]

Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast

1×

0:00

-1:28:03

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, No. 22-660 [Arg: 10.10.2023]

Issue(s): Whether, following the burden-shifting framework that governs cases under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a whistleblower must prove his employer acted with a “retaliatory intent”.

Nov 13, 2023

Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efd

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, No. 22-660 [Arg: 10.10.2023]

Issue(s): Whether, following the burden-shifting framework that governs cases under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a whistleblower must prove his employer acted with a “retaliatory intent” as part of his case in chief, or whether the lack of “retaliatory intent” is part of the affirmative defense on which the employer bears the burden of proof.

If you wish to donate to my campaign here is the link below:
To Donate to my campaign for the US House NC #2.

0 Comments

Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast

A site for interesting stuff on the fight between Good and Evil on the earth that God created, particularly in United States Politics. From God's special revelation of the Good News of Jesus Christ, to General Revelation in my specialty, the teaching of College/University Chemistry, and other subjects of interest.

Listen on