Huddleston Vs FBI update

Interesting update regarding FOIA requests of FBI for Crowdstrike and Seth Rich information.

An interesting update for the Huddleston Vs FBI/DOJ case where the plaintiffs are contesting FOIA request denials regarding Crowdstrike and Seth Rich Laptop, other evidence the FBI may be aware of. This filing uses the classics, we do not have responsive documents, or “if we did, there is an active investigation” which we all have seen before. I am curious for any Russia Sleuths comments on this, particularly the lawyers in the group. I find the text of this filing pretty odd and interesting at the same time, which seems to indicate the FBI/DOJ is still hiding a lot from the Public, perhaps Durham and other concerned parties. - efd

All the documents/filings for this case:

Huddleston Vs FBI/DOJ FOIA lawsuit.

136KB ∙ PDF file

Download

I find this filing very interesting, as it seems to be saying, "we do not have responsive documents" and/or "if we do have any responsive documents, there are active investigations, so we won't release them". Very weird.

Download